
Tenant Data Isolation: Patterns and Anti-Patterns
Explore effective patterns and pitfalls of tenant data isolation in multi-tenant systems to enhance security and compliance.
Jul 30, 2025
Read More
Staff augmentation isn't one-size-fits-all. Bringing on a developer for 2 weeks requires different contracting, onboarding, and management than a 2-year engagement. Use the wrong model and you'll either pay premium rates for simple work or burn out contractors with unrealistic expectations. Get it right, and you scale your team efficiently while maintaining quality and morale.
At Propelius Technologies, we've placed 200+ augmented engineers across both short and long-term engagements. This guide breaks down when to use each model, what they cost, and how to structure them for success.
Duration: 2 weeks to 6 months
Typical use cases:
Pricing model: Usually hourly or weekly, with premium rates
Duration: 6 months to 2+ years
Typical use cases:
Pricing model: Monthly retainer, lower per-hour effective rate
| Engagement Type | Rate Range | True Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Term (hourly) | $60-120/hr | $10K-20K/month | Premium for flexibility, faster onboarding |
| Long-Term (monthly) | $4K-8K/month | $4K-8K/month | Discounted rate, dedicated resource |
| Full-Time US Hire | $120K-180K/year | $10K-15K/month | + benefits, equity, overhead |
Key insight: Short-term augmentation is 2-3x more expensive per hour than long-term, but you only pay when you need them. Long-term is cheaper per hour but requires minimum commitment (usually 6-12 months).
Example: "We need to migrate our codebase from Python 2 to Python 3. Estimated 3 months of work."
Why short-term:
Structure: 1-2 senior engineers, 12 weeks, weekly check-ins
Example: "Our product launches in 6 weeks. We're behind on QA testing and bug fixes."
Why short-term:
Structure: 2-4 QA testers + 1 automation engineer, 6-8 weeks
Example: "We need a security audit and penetration testing before our enterprise customer signs."
Why short-term:
Structure: 1 security specialist, 2-4 weeks, audit report deliverable
Example: "We think we need a dedicated mobile engineer, but not 100% sure."
Why short-term:
Structure: 1 mobile engineer, 3 months trial, convert to long-term if successful
Example: "We ship features continuously. Need consistent development capacity."
Why long-term:
Structure: 3-5 full-stack engineers, 12+ month engagement, embedded in squads
Example: "We need a DevOps engineer to own our infrastructure full-time."
Why long-term:
Structure: 1 senior DevOps engineer, dedicated, 18+ months
Example: "Our engineering team is 100% Bay Area. Burn rate is unsustainable."
Why long-term:
Structure: 5-10 augmented engineers, 24+ months, fully integrated
Example: "We want 16-hour development days (US + India/Eastern Europe)."
Why long-term:
Structure: Mirror US team in offshore location, 18+ months
Many successful teams use both models simultaneously:
Long-term core team (70% of capacity):
Short-term specialists (30% of capacity):
Benefits:
Typical terms:
Pros: Maximum flexibility, easy exit
Cons: Higher cost, less commitment from contractor
Typical terms:
Pros: Cost efficiency, deep integration, contractor loyalty
Cons: Commitment required, slower to exit
Choose Short-Term If:
Choose Long-Term If:
Still unsure? Start short-term (3 months), convert to long-term if successful.
When: Contractor performing well + ongoing need identified
Process:
When: Critical role + contractor wants FTE + company ready to hire
Process:
Yes, this is common and recommended if you're uncertain. Start with 3-month engagement, evaluate performance and ongoing need, then convert to long-term with lower monthly rate. Most vendors support this transition.
Most vendors require 2-4 weeks minimum due to onboarding overhead. For ultra-short needs (1 week), expect even higher premium rates or consider freelance platforms (Upwork, Toptal) instead of staff augmentation firms.
Treat them like employees — meaningful work, career development, recognition. Offer competitive rates (reassess annually). Communicate long-term plans so they see future. Good vendors also retain talent by rotating them between projects if your engagement ends.
Short-term: Weekly or bi-weekly invoicing, Net-15 payment. Long-term: Monthly invoicing, Net-30 payment. Some vendors require upfront deposit (first month) for new clients. Payment terms are usually negotiable based on your creditworthiness.
Absolutely. Many companies use US contractors for specialized short-term needs (easier timezone, faster ramp-up) and offshore for long-term capacity (cost efficiency). The hybrid approach leverages strengths of each market.
Short-term and long-term staff augmentation serve different needs. Don't force one model to fit all situations.
Short-term: Maximum flexibility for projects, spikes, and specialists. Pay premium for responsiveness.
Long-term: Cost-efficient capacity for core needs. Invest in onboarding for sustained productivity.
Hybrid: Most effective approach — stable core team (long-term) + flexible specialists (short-term).
Start smart: If uncertain, begin with short-term, prove value, then convert to long-term for better economics.
At Propelius Technologies, we support both models — from 2-week projects to 2-year dedicated teams. Get in touch to discuss the right staffing strategy for your needs.
Need an expert team to provide digital solutions for your business?
Book A Free CallDive into a wealth of knowledge with our unique articles and resources. Stay informed about the latest trends and best practices in the tech industry.
View All articlesTell us about your vision. We'll respond within 24 hours with a free AI-powered estimate.
© 2026 Propelius Technologies. All rights reserved.